To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthackingOpen lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / NXT / NXT Firmware Hacking / 83
82  |  84
Subject: 
Re: Alternate NXT-Firmware flashing tools
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking
Date: 
Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:02:48 GMT
Viewed: 
26271 times
  
> However, this thread makes me wonder: how many versions of fwflash are
> there already for the NXT? Is there more than one? And, as a hacking
> community, is there a good excuse/reason for this? The uploading tools
> are a critical part of every (independent) runtime project, and having
> them be ad-hoc and per-runtime strikes me as a sad way for the
> community to go. Is that the road we're already on, or are people
> collaborating with each-other across projects to make sure that we
> have one uploading tool to rule them all, and in darkness, to bind
> them?
> 
> (Apologies to J.R.R.T.).
> 
> Cheers,
>  M

Hi Matt,
I think the problem is, that 99% of users using MS and Intel equipment...
Minorities, like me, have always problems when using this :D

I can't resist...
Bye
Christian



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Alternate NXT-Firmware flashing tools
 
Hi all, (...) Recently, we finished a runtime for the RCX, and discovered the awful state of uploading tools for that platform. In particular, there are at least three versions of firmdl running around the net, each capable handling different (...) (19 years ago, 28-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking)

9 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR