To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.nxtOpen lugnet.robotics.nxt in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / NXT / 47
46  |  48
Subject: 
RE: NXT Motors -- Speed vs Power Level
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.nxt
Date: 
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:58:59 GMT
Reply-To: 
<dickswan@sbcglobalANTISPAM.net>
Viewed: 
5986 times
  
Daniele Benedettelli wrote:
I tried to plot power levels vs angular speed (in rad/s) and
discovered good linearity (remember how non-linear was RCX PWM)?

I've done the same measurements/plots and found same linearity when
'brake' on inactive PWM cycles is used. Not so good when 'float' is
used.

This leads to a conundrum that I simply can't explain.

If you use 'inactive brake' mode the motors start moving at power level
around 10 or less. Now if you use 'float' mode they don't start moving
until power level is around 40. This is totally counter intuitive.  I
can't understand why a motor with 10% power on and 90% braking 'pulses'
starts moving before a motor with 40% power on and 60% coasting!

Can anyone think of a good explanation?



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: NXT Motors -- Speed vs Power Level
 
I tried to plot power levels vs angular speed (in rad/s) and discovered goooood linearity ( remember how non-linear was RCX PWM)? The PID loop is a great idea, and I suppose that PID parameters should be tweakable. In SDK or HDK ( don't remember (...) (18 years ago, 3-Aug-06, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.nxt)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in...

Robotics

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
11 hours ago

NXT programmable brick

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
11 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR