 | | Re: Improving the firmware?
|
|
In article <JBFwGp.30p@lugnet.com>, Guy Ziv <guy@nxtasy.org> writes (...) I would like to be able to rebuild the firmware & experiment with it before I get too ambitious. Has anybody fixed up the code to build with the gcc tools and made it (...) (18 years ago, 8-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the firmware?
|
|
(...) These would be very nice to have, but they cannot be integrated into NXT-G unless you modify the compiler (which we can't!). NBC/NXC can benefit from such improvements, of course. I think there are many improvements which WOULD make a (...) (18 years ago, 7-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the firmware?
|
|
Hi all, I doubt this will go through, as I've never been able to post anything to this group yet... I know that the group of us working on the Transterpreter[1] are actively interested in collaborating on such an effort. While the kinds of (...) (18 years ago, 7-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Connect BT devices to the NXT without a passkey?
|
|
In article <025201c73045$8574a7...kdesktop>, Dick Swan <dickswan@sbcglobal.net> writes (...) This is true. (...) The pre-approved Bluetooth low level stack is proprietary to CSR. The code that runs in CSR's Virtual Machine to implement the serial (...) (18 years ago, 7-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the firmware?
|
|
(...) I am very interested in a community project to enhance the NXT standard firmware. I've submitted a few bug fixes and enhancements to LEGO already which hopefully will make it into the next official firmware release. Enhancements I plan on (...) (18 years ago, 6-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
