Subject:
|
Re: IR (formally 6.8nF cap)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.handyboard
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Jul 2000 07:39:59 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
John Hatton <john.hatton@uk.AVOIDSPAMairsysatm.thomson-csf.com>
|
Viewed:
|
1068 times
|
| |
|
|
So as the 39KHz value would be ok for either the IS1U60 (38KHz) or the
hacked sensors (40KHz), will my idea for the hacked IR sensor distance
measurement using the IR output circuitry to drive multiple LEDs also be
valid ?.
Thanks for the help.
John Hatton.
Fred G. Martin wrote:
> there's not really a big diff in the performance of the ir sensors
> given 38 or 40 khz. so either is fine, +/- a few khz just doesn't
> really matter, you have to detune 10 khz or so for it to matter.
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: IR (formally 6.8nF cap)
|
| there's not really a big diff in the performance of the ir sensors given 38 or 40 khz. so either is fine, +/- a few khz just doesn't really matter, you have to detune 10 khz or so for it to matter. there is an issue whereby there are two different (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
