Subject:
|
Re: sonar
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.handyboard
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Mar 2000 17:10:18 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Will Bain <WILLB@SELWAY.UMT.saynotospamEDU>
|
Viewed:
|
1320 times
|
| |
|
|
John Wynne wrote:
>
> Just wondering... in reference to the modification on the Polaroid 6500
> sonar ranging board, there's been two different assertions. Should the 0.1uF
> cap be of a polarized (e.g. electrolytic, tant, etc.) or non-polarized
> variety (as stated below)?... or does it matter?
I don't think it matters much. I used a 'lytic and it works fine. If you have another kind, it probably wouldn't hurt to give it a try.
-- Will
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ^^ <^ ^> |
| / òó ó°° \ |
| / =Y= U \ |
| Wendy, Will, Tatoosh & Tenzing |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
There's a fine line between fishing and just standing on
the shore like an idiot -- Steven Wright
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | IR emitters !
|
| Hi ! Can we connect two ir emitters to the HB IRout port (female connector J7) for left and right obstacle detection ? If so ! how do we distinguish between the left IR led and right IR led transmission since I'm planning to use only one Ir detector (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: sonar
|
| Just wondering... in reference to the modification on the Polaroid 6500 sonar ranging board, there's been two different assertions. Should the 0.1uF cap be of a polarized (e.g. electrolytic, tant, etc.) or non-polarized variety (as stated below)?... (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
