To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.handyboardOpen lugnet.robotics.handyboard in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / Handy Board / 5438
5437  |  5439
Subject: 
Re: Stupid multiple sonars...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.handyboard
Date: 
Wed, 10 Feb 1999 18:33:09 GMT
Original-From: 
William Bain <willbain@cs.umt.edu+avoidspam+>
Viewed: 
1121 times
  
Ian Hojnicki <damasta@camelot.bradley.edu> wrote:
I guess I have a really simple question to ask...  I know that I can
share many of the lines off of the SPI in order to hook up two polaroid
sensors...  However, is it really necessary to add a diode to each of the
ECHO lines?  If so, what are the specs for those diodes?  I am basing the
fact that I can use D3 for the additional INIT line for the second
sonar.  IS THIS CORRECT?

It is correct that you can use the remaining SPI pins as digital outs to
trigger a second sonar.  I've done it and it works fine.

It's also true that there *is* signal contention on the echo lines if you
simply plug 'em both into the same TIC port.  I don't yet know whether
diodes will fix the problem, but I'll give it a try and let you all know.

--Will



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Stupid multiple sonars...
 
a small signal diode like 1N914 should do. -----Original Message----- From: Ian Hojnicki <damasta@camelot.bradley.edu> To: handyboard@media.mit.edu <handyboard@media.mit.edu> Date: Tuesday, February 09, 1999 12:16 AM Subject: Stupid multiple (...) (26 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR