Subject:
|
Re: Stack Overflow
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.handyboard
|
Date:
|
Sat, 23 Jan 1999 23:00:16 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Regan Russell <[rrussell@c2.telstra]spamless[-mm.net.au]>
|
Viewed:
|
1162 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi there,
In my humble opinion, I suspect that the problem is with
Interactive C.. Try a newer or older version. What version
are you using, by the way ?
To quote Levine et al, "lex & yacc", 2nd Ed, O'Rielly & Assoc
page 259:
"yacc stack overflow ....The yacc generated grammar has
exhausted its stack space ... Solution: Shorten or reorder the
expressions in the lex specification; rebuild lex with a larger
yacc stack area."
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Regan Russell BSc (Comp Sci)
www.users.bigpond.net.au/rrussell
-----Original Message-----
From: William Sitch <wsitch@engsoc.carleton.ca>
To: handyboard@media.mit.edu <handyboard@media.mit.edu>
Date: Sunday, January 24, 1999 6:35 AM
Subject: Stack Overflow
>
> Hi everyone:
>
> I'm trying to download a rather large chunk of code to the HandyBoard,
> and I'm having a problem when I exceed a certain number of instructions in • a
> procedure I'm running. When I try to download the code, I get the error
> "yacc stack overflow" pointing to a line in a procedure that I spawn to be
> multitasked.
>
> I tried to increase the stack size of the process I spawn, but the error
> still exists. I think I might be getting a compile-time stack overflow - • or
> something like that. The procedure it crashes for is a leg controller, and
> consists of many "if .. else if" statements.
>
> It would be bad design to move some of the code to another procedure, and I
> would like to avoid doing that. Does anyone know exactly why I'm having
> this problem, or what I could do to remedy the situation?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --
> William Sitch
> 4th Year Electrical Engineering http://www.engsoc.carleton.ca/~wsitch
>
>
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
