Subject:
|
Re: Optical Sensors
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.handyboard
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Mar 1998 16:07:12 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Craig Maynard (EE) <craig.maynard@sait.*spamcake*ab.ca>
|
Viewed:
|
1421 times
|
| |
|
|
With sumo wrestling robots, I find that the high freqency noise from the
robots and motors tends to confuse the recievers, expecially the metallic
impact and collateral damage :)
The ring is small enough that, though sonar is useful, greater success
has come from feelers, optical, and infra-red sensors.
imho
Craig Maynard
Western Canadian Robot Games
( Nov 15 <--- shameless plug! )
On Wed, 4 Mar 1998, Mark Limb wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am making a Sumo Wrestling Robot at university. the robot is totally
> autonomous, and I was wondering if sonic transducers were the best for
> "seeing" another moving robot. Range is not necessary but desireable in
> the sensor. Previous robots of this kind have used the sonic
> transducers and I was wondering if there was anything better? I have
> checked on the net but its very hard to find any information unless you
> know where to look.
> Thanks.
> Joshua Wherrett
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Optical Sensors
|
| Hi All, I am making a Sumo Wrestling Robot at university. the robot is totally autonomous, and I was wondering if sonic transducers were the best for "seeing" another moving robot. Range is not necessary but desireable in the sensor. Previous robots (...) (27 years ago, 4-Mar-98, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
