Subject:
|
Re: Polaroid software driver
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.handyboard
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 May 1997 14:40:30 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
MAR ERICSON <mar@[IHateSpam]cooper.edu>
|
Viewed:
|
1484 times
|
| |
|
|
-----------
ericson mar
Master of Engineering Candidate
Project: Mobile Robotics
mar@cooper.edu
(212)353-4356
Department of Mechanical Engineering
The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art
-------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, 14 May 1997, Yoni Garbourg wrote:
>
> 1) Doesn't using motor driver chip pins 1 and 9 disable correct operation
> of that motor chip. That is, when you poke to those outputs, doesn't that
> effect the motor outputs of that chip?
>
> 2) Aside from the difficulties involved in writing assembly code and then
> assembling it with as11_ic assembler, why shouldn't I use the SPI digital
> outputs for INIT and BINH on the Polaroid unit. Is there something
> special about the motor driver circuitry???
>
> 3) What would be wrong with writing completely IC code to handle sonar
> routines?
>
> Thank you for your paience.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Yoni Garbourg
>
> << To succeed, Atificial Intelligence needs
> 1.7 Einsteins, two Maxwells, five Faradays,
> and .3 Manhattan Projects." >>
>
> -John McCarthy
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Polaroid software driver
|
| 1) Doesn't using motor driver chip pins 1 and 9 disable correct operation of that motor chip. That is, when you poke to those outputs, doesn't that effect the motor outputs of that chip? 2) Aside from the difficulties involved in writing assembly (...) (27 years ago, 14-May-97, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
