I would rather have use of the 0 to 8 range because many of the values in the 0 to 100 range simply fall into groups which give only 9 speeds. However, I do not support rewriting the IC code. Tom's suggestion, motor(1,value*14), is simple and meets (...) (29 years ago, 18-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
