 | | Re[2]: IR Collision avoidance —Richard Whitehead
|
| | | Bill, Why is everyone using a digital device to try to detect the (analogue) distance to an object? Especially one with AGC, it makes no sense! I modulated the IR at 10KHz (high enough to be away from mains light flicker, but out of the way of the (...) (28 years ago, 3-Mar-97, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Re[2]: IR Collision avoidance —Adam
|
| | | | | Richard, I've tried the op-amp method and had some success. I just don't know how I would power the -5V via the HB. Do you have any suggestions? Thanks. (...) (28 years ago, 3-Mar-97, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: IR Collision avoidance —Chuck McManis
|
| | | | | | (...) The Sharp IR modules are not being used to detect distance, they are being used simply as non-contact bumpers. This allows one to inexpensively put an arbitrarily long 'whisker' on your robot. The advantage to these things are that they are (...) (28 years ago, 3-Mar-97, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: IR Collision avoidance —Bill Richman
|
| | | | | | The part number on the device from Radio Shack is "GP1U52X". In our earlier discussions, I thought I made it clear that I was using "the Radio Shack IR detector module", although I may not have quoted the number. If Sharp makes a module without the (...) (28 years ago, 4-Mar-97, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Re[2]: IR Collision avoidance —Chris Moore
|
| | | | (...) Richard, In my case there are two reasons. First, I'm not trying to find the actual distance. I just want to know if there is something within a particular range. I don't care if it's an inch away or a foot. The second reason is that I can get (...) (28 years ago, 3-Mar-97, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| | | | |
