| | Re: Diodes for Sonar Assembly
|
|
yes, this is fine. the 5404s have a higher voltage rating, so they're "better". the 5401's are specified because they'd be cheaper and are already more than adequate. fred In your message you said: (...) I (...) e (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
|
| | Diodes for Sonar Assembly
|
|
On the official plans on the HB web site, it says to connect 6 1N5401 diodes for a voltage drop. Can I use 1N5404s instead? We got our sonar module the other day and are itching to try it out. After visiting various Radio Shacks I couldn't find the (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
|
| | Re: IR decode disabling
|
|
I came across the same line in the lib_hb.c-file, hoping to achieve more performance but as I was told by Fred Martin, the default setting is OFF. Dirk (24 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
|
| | Re: sharp gp2d12 infrared ranging sensors (fwd)
|
|
A little known fact is that this does NOT work on inputs 3, or 6. Cutting the leads on 1,2,4, or 5 works just fine. If you cut the traces on 3, or 6, simply put a solder bridge across the signal and 5V leads to put things back to normal. If you run (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
|
| | Re: Gleason Research
|
|
Dear Joe Kopena: We are here and are sorry you have found any difficulty in getting a prompt response. We have no record of having received email from you yourself. We have recently faxed a quote to another party at Drexel. Perhaps your email was (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|