 | | Help needed!
|
|
Hi, I have assembled my recently bought Handy Board kit and have run into major problems: In paragraph 6.0.5 of the assembly manual, the Handy Board is tested for the microprocessor and memory circuits. After powering up the board and running IC (...) (28 years ago, 28-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re: Handy Board inputs
|
|
Hi Becky, If you are using the HB with the expansion board, you *do* need new library files loaded. Check the web site at: (URL) easiest way to run new library files is to edit lib_hb.lis to include them. To test the HB inputs w/o the expansion (...) (28 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Handy Board inputs
|
|
Hi, my name is Becky Browning. I am currently working on building a robot using the Handy Board. I am having considerable troubles though getting either the digital or analog inputs to work. Right now I have analogs ports 0 and 1 working with (...) (28 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | analog inputs on expansion board
|
|
Hi, Two questions: 1) When I plug a Lego reflectance sensor into the expansion board it seems to work fine. When I use the angle sensor it seems to work fine. When I plug them in at the same time the angle sensor stops working. No change to the (...) (28 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | GCC 2.8.1 for HC11
|
|
A great link for people doing HC11 work: www.msoe.edu/eecs/ce.../resources Here they have Wookie, a HC11 simulator for Win32, the WinBug11 downloader, a DOS HC11 simulator, AS6811 and ASLINK (relocatable assembler), and something I've sought for a (...) (28 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re: HB Memory
|
|
Thanks everybody. (28 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re: [Fwd: Robot Mapping]
|
|
-->Heck, that sounds pretty easy. As long as you know where you start from and you use a cartesian or -->polar form of V=vsub0 + a*t integrated over time, and you are either working in a vacuum or at such low -->velocities that c sub d is (...) (28 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re: [Fwd: Robot Mapping]
|
|
(...) Heck, that sounds pretty easy. As long as you know where you start from and you use a cartesian or polar form of V=vsub0 + a*t integrated over time, and you are either working in a vacuum or at such low velocities that c sub d is negligible, (...) (28 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | [Fwd: Robot Mapping]
|
|
-- ___...___ Jonathan Pennington -Anthropologist/Geologist -Linux User and Advocate -Bart Simpson Sympathizer Email at jwp(at)awod.com ___...___ (28 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re: Robot Mapping
|
|
(...) I've been thinking about this too. The problem as I see it is that without some shaft encoders on the wheels, your robot doesn't really know how far it's moved, and therefore where it is in the map. If you power on the forward motor for 2 (...) (28 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
