|
|
 | | (no subject)
|
| (...) I agree that the "software" solution in an HC11 is limiting. It is this limitation that I am trying to overcome in hardware. Rather than shift a bit-pattern out for PWM, I would use three of the built-in timers to accomplish the task. One (...) (28 years ago, 27-Jun-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | Re:
|
| (...) Actually an 'HC11 isn't a very efficient PWM controller. However a Microchip PIC is. (or a Motorola 68HC05, or a Siemans 87C752, etc) These single chip microcontrollers are both cost effective and easy to use. In the July (or August) '95 issue (...) (28 years ago, 26-Jun-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | (no subject)
|
| My earlier posting has left me thinking.. (Suprise!) A MUCH more efficient way of doing PWM would be to use another 'HC11. The counter-timer circuits are perfect for the job, and the SPI would serve just fine for communications. Of course, this (...) (28 years ago, 26-Jun-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | (no subject)
|
| What's Happening?? (Or, trying to spark some interaction) I currently am working on a few hardware projects for the Handy-Board.. As I may have described earlier.. Current projects include 4 boards, each on a PC slightly smaller than the (...) (28 years ago, 26-Jun-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | Re: ??
|
| (...) Ahh, well that's good, and bad. :-) C'mon everyone, what's everybody _doing_ with their handy board? Letting it sit on the desk, beeping and collecting dust? (28 years ago, 26-Jun-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
|
