 | | Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
|
From: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> (...) multitasking (...) the (...) you (...) Even with the 32 variable limit I think that you can make programs which exhibit pretty complex behaviors. I plan to play with pbForth and LegOS soon, but really (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
|
(...) I hate to see this about a toy I've had so much fun with, but it isn't likely that (esp. once you upgrade to pbForth or legOS) you'll feel limited by software, even with the 32K limitation. The big limitation is hardware. The sensors (esp. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
|
From: "Luis Villa" <liv@duke.edu> (...) This is 100% true. When I first bought my RCX I bought two of them figuring that I'd use them in a master/slave configuration to do useful stuff with more then three sensors. I haven't had much time in my life (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
