Subject:
|
Re: Rack-and-pinion steering line tracker
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Jan 2000 15:22:52 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
The WordMeister <wordsmth@ici.netANTISPAM>
|
Reply-To:
|
The WordMeister <DWILCOX@WORDSMITHDIGITAL.spamlessCOM>
|
Viewed:
|
716 times
|
| |
|
|
Okay, maybe I have been just a leeeeeeetle too proud of that assembly. But I
spent so much time prototyping and debugging a fairly simple concept ... I
was thrilled to finally get it to work.
If you think _that_ was bulky, wait 'till I find the photos of what my
"bomber fly" tram-bot became. :)
--The WordMeister
Doug Wilcox
WordSmith Digital Document Services
403 VFW Drive
Rockland, MA 02370
781-871-6162
fax 781-871-6264
http://www.wordsmithdigital.com
• Searchable Digital Documents on CD
• Web Design (including e-commerce) • Scanning
• Desktop Publishing • Graphics Design
• Computer/Software Consulting (Technical Wizardry)
• Computer Demons Exorcised
• Officially Registered in Dogbert's New Ruling Class
-----Original Message-----
From: Tilman Sporkert <tilman@activesw.com>
To: The WordMeister <dwilcox@wordsmithdigital.com>; Simon Bogaert
<Simon.Bogaert@advalvas.be>; lego-robotics@crynwr.com
<lego-robotics@crynwr.com>
Date: Friday, January 07, 2000 8:18 PM
Subject: RE: Rack-and-pinion steering line tracker
> I too spent quite some time trying to build a steering mechanism from • standard
> Mindstorms parts. After many rebuilds I still wasn't quite satisfied. The • final
> version actually worked pretty well, but was much too bulky (not as bulky • as
> Doug's version however :-) ), and the wheels were tilted inward too much • for my
> taste. So I decided to see what I could do with some more specialized Lego
> parts. I could have just bought the service pack with the various Lego • steering
> mechanism parts from S@H. But no, I decided to use it as an excuse to buy • all
> sorts of Technic sets. Along the way I learned that Lego can't make up • their
> mind about how to build a steering mechanism either. There are so many
> variations!
>
> About the return to center problem: My solution is to incorporate the light
> sensor into the steering mechanism. Mount it at the end of a short arm • pointing
> forward, ahead of your wheels. This has two advantages:
> - You will get a much smoother steering vehicle, with gradual steering
> movements.
> - You don't have to worry about centering the steering mechanism.
>
> With the traditional approach, you will be sensing that you are off the • track.
> But you don't really know how far to turn the wheels to stay on the track. • So
> you make a best guess, turn too far, until you are back on center. Now you • have
> to figure out how to go straight again.
>
> With my approach, you keep the light sensor on the track all the time, and • the
> vehicle sort of follows it. As soon as the sensor moves off center, you • start
> steering to keep the sensor on the track. The steering system is now part • of a
> direct feedback loop, and will always point in the right direction.
>
> This of course doesn't make the steering system any easier. You now have to • turn
> three things - the two wheels, and the arm that holds the sensor.
>
> Tilman
>
>
> > I spent a _lot_ of time trying to get a non-sensored R&P steering system • to
> > work, using pulleys, rubber bands (both as drives and springs), and
> > you-name-it! I finally gave up, but did manage to build one with only • _one_
> > sensor that was very effective.
> >
> > See http://www.wordsmithdigital.com/mindstorms/ for a scan and my • described
> > history of running my head into the wall. Should get you started in the
> > right direction--or avoid getting you started in the wrong direction.
> >
> > Ironically, I've started playing with roboticizing the 8479 as well!
> >
> > --Doug Wilcox
>
>
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
