Subject:
|
RE: subassemblies
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 18:10:57 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Will Gage <WGage@^nospam^concretemedia.com>
|
Viewed:
|
603 times
|
| |
|
|
yeah, i'm just getting started (as in bought a set two days ago and haven't
had
the time to build anything yet), and i expect the first several months of
experimenting
won't be worth remembering anyway. but for those people that have had time
to develop some worthwhile ideas, i would imagine that having a systematic
way to record
what you built without having to save the creation itself would be a major
time
(and money) saver. since there's only a finite number of component parts,
it seems
like it would lend itself to a systematic notation. lego's engineers must
have some way of doing this, right? i'll try to keep my mouth shut until
i've got something besides abstraction to contribute, though.
-will
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Bertschi [mailto:Cptgldfsh@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 1:02 PM
To: lego-robotics@crynwr.com
Subject: Re: subassemblies
In lugnet.robotics, Will Gage <WGage@concretemedia.com> writes:
> out of curiosity. . .
> how do people notate their designs?
> it would be extremely cool to have a standard way of communicating
> the various lego combinations. is everyone just sketching when they
> want to remember how they put something together?
Personally, I don't notate anything. Part of what I like is finding a
totally
different solution than the one I used last time. Makes for slower
building,
but leaves more room for improvement. Now that I have a digital camera,
I've
begun taking pictures but that's really just to prove to my friends that it
did so work.
I like the sub-assembilies idea and Lego is drifting that way (see Beach
Buggy
and new RIS sets) but it's something I haven't done.
peace
---Todd
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
