Subject:
|
RE: spectre update #2 12/16
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 00:00:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
624 times
|
| |
|
|
> What I need from the list is the following:
>
> -Commentary on the spec
> -an explanation of the se_rcxsend function (Kekoa's
> comments are too meager for me to make much sense of
> the code :-( )
Ummm, the code IS the comments. Doesn't everyone do it
that way?
Seriously, I've worked on too many systems where the
comments don't reflect the code. Read the comments
if there are any, but NEVER assume they are correct.
Cheers,
Ralph Hempel - P.Eng
--------------------------------------------------------
Check out pbFORTH for LEGO Mindstorms at:
<http://www.hempeldesigngroup.com/lego/pbFORTH>
--------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: rhempel at bmts dot com
--------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | spectre update #2 12/16
|
| There's not much to put in this one, but there is something: I've been putting off doing much real work on Spectre lately, but I do have most of send.c factored. I'll be posting it along with a beta-quality Seance spec tonight or tomorrow, depending (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
