Subject:
|
Re: Selflearning Scout robot
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Nov 1999 08:42:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
471 times
|
| |
|
|
Bert van Dam <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> writes:
> Yes, you did prove me wrong, and I promised to put a link to your robot on
> my site. But then my harddrive crashed and I lost all my mail, including
> your address. But I'll live up to my promise and add you right now!
Thanks! Excuse me, I couldn't resist poking you about that :-)
> This particular braintype can be used for a bit more complex behaviour, but
> that's rather limited. I'd opt for a neural brain for that but I don't • think
> I can fit one in the 1k memory of the Scout :)
Did you succeed in implementing a neural net on the RCX? I'm sure it IS
possible, if not with NQC surely with legOS (though with NQC too we
succeeded in emulating arrays for our tic-tac-toe player). But I haven't
seen any code around yet.
Mario
Web page: http://www.geocities.com/~marioferrari
LUGNET member page: http://www.lugnet.com/people/members/?m=22
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Selflearning Scout robot
|
| (...) We have something vaguely similar (a "reinforcement learning" robot, specifically Q learning.) Probably even more computationally intense than the average neural net (depending on a number of factors). I have some code, but I've been meaning (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Selflearning Scout robot
|
| Hi Mario, Yes, you did prove me wrong, and I promised to put a link to your robot on my site. But then my harddrive crashed and I lost all my mail, including your address. But I'll live up to my promise and add you right now! This particular (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
