To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 8287
8286  |  8288
Subject: 
Re: Pure Energy & the RCX
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 17 Nov 1999 19:04:31 GMT
Original-From: 
J. G. Gregory <jgg@&antispam&ultranet.com>
Viewed: 
717 times
  
----- Original Message -----
From: The WordMeister <dwilcox@wordsmithdigital.com>
To: J G Gregory <jgg@ultranet.com>; <lego-robotics@crynwr.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: Pure Energy & the RCX


(2) It would be _really_ easy to rig up an external power pack. I, too, • have
found the battery replacement in certain models a bit tricky.

Yes, by hacking away.  Technically, anything is possible.  But it just
surprises me that they opted to make a single combo unit.  Think how much
better a Technic part the RCX would be without the battery pack.  Thinner,
lighter, different size/shape.  It could be high, while the weight of the
batteries was kept low.

And they obviously have stuck to this, seeing the scout and the micro-scout.

--Jack Gregory



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Pure Energy & the RCX
 
Hmmm. Two things: (1) I can usually identify a bad battery in the set because it will not charge (the charging light/LED stays on forever), but this is obviously not always true. (2) It would be _really_ easy to rig up an external power pack. I, (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
11 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR