 | | Re: legOS corruption —Ralph Hempel
|
| | | Ben Laurie wrote in message <365E93F5.63ABFE6B@a....co.uk>... (...) I do embedded systems WITHOUT a logic analyser. You can do about 99% of what you need to with a monitor and an oscilloscope. The logic analyser (or emulator) is the big gun for the (...) (26 years ago, 27-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: legOS corruption —Fred Read
|
| | | | (...) Agree with you totally there! However, I have always found it useful to have a debugging version of the kernel which allows you to use something like gdb to debug your embedded system through a serial port. (...) Sadly, the last embedded (...) (26 years ago, 27-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: legOS corruption —Ralph Hempel
|
| | | | | Fred Read wrote in message <365EA592.62DE2792@c...net.uk>... (...) That's what I meant by monitor - sorry I wasn't more clear... Cheers, Ralph Hempel - P.Eng ---...--- The train stops at the train station, The bus stops at the bus station, So why (...) (26 years ago, 27-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: legOS corruption —Ben Laurie
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, yeah. I'm sure we've all got "I debugged that with no more than an LED and 3 inches of wire" stories, but only a fool would spurn a logic analyser when it was available. Cheers, Ben. (26 years ago, 28-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: legOS corruption —Ralph Hempel
|
| | | | Ben Laurie wrote in message <36606582.FFA56883@a....co.uk>... (...) Aha, the flame war has begun :-) I agree with you too Ben, only a fool would spurn the analyser, but if you instrument your project properly and really KNOW the system, you can (...) (26 years ago, 29-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
