Subject:
|
Re: Functional languages and/or RCX wrapper code
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:37:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
760 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, Brian Connors wrote:
> -Finally, the big question: what in the world is
> anyone actually going to do with Spectre when it's
> completed?
Hmm. No real idea, except say we can. Frankly, something that has been
nagging at me lately is: what happens with all of this wealth of software
that we've created when RCX 2.0 comes out? There is enough software out
there to do really great stuff, but the HW ends up being incredibly
limiting when you want to stretch the limits of the software. I really,
really hope that the next version of the bot expands on the HW without
causing serious problems in porting over all this stuff.
As far as using it, well, I'd probably use it to (basically) export stuff
that is really hard to debug to the PC, and end up using the 'bot mainly
for simple on the fly calculatios and as a mobile sensor platform.
-Luis
#######################################################################
Profanity is the one language that all programmers understand.
-Anonymous
#######################################################################
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Functional languages and/or RCX wrapper code
|
| (...) Okay, here's the idea: send.c is a pretty simple program in structure; there are only about five functions in it, three of which (rcx_send(), rcx_init(), and rcx_close() ) form the logical core of the Seance API. The logical fourth function (...) (25 years ago, 16-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
