Subject:
|
Re: Forth vs Assembler
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 13 Oct 1999 18:20:53 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Ben Williamson <(benw@pobox.)AvoidSpam(com)>
|
Viewed:
|
1796 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, John Barnes wrote:
> Very cryptic by the looks! Why not use honest to goodness assembly language
> to do this stuff. It's really very easy, especially on Motorola CPUs.
It's especially easy to program in assembly for whatever CPU architecture
you happen to be familiar with. If you've got a background in Motorola
parts, that makes them easy for you. I grew up on Z80 and ARM, so it's
different for me. BTW, the RCX has a Hitachi part. :)
- Ben.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Williamson benw@pobox.com http://www.pobox.com/~benw/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Forth vs Assembler
|
| Since observing these Lego email broadcasts, I've been wondering what Forth was. Engineering background, not CS! Now I know, after reading Ralph Hempel's "RE: Mindstorms/reinforcement learning". Very cryptic by the looks! Why not use honest to (...) (27 years ago, 13-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
