 | | Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0 —Robert Munafo
|
| | | (...) It would be better to implement this via a multiplexor brick (which contains a circuit like this one: (URL) a similar brick that performs a similar function for multiplexing outputs. You could also build a connector plate for multiple touch (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0 —Michael Nickasch
|
| | | | | i was thinking from the bots and sensors arrays that i have used that maybe there should be a touch sensor that works in reverse positively, as in it's neutral position would be depressed and the trigger would be in an "out" position just an idea. (...) (25 years ago, 23-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0 —Michael Nickasch
|
| | | | i was thinking from the bots and sensors arrays that i have used that maybe there should be a touch sensor that works in reverse positively, as in it's neutral position would be depressed and the trigger would be in an "out" position just an idea. (...) (25 years ago, 23-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0 —Kerry Raymond
|
| | | | All I'd ask of an RIS 2.0 is a huge bank of inputs and a huge bank of outputs. 3 of each is just not enough. Kerry -- ===...=== Dr Kerry Raymond, Distinguished Research Fellow kerry@dstc.edu.au CRC for Enterprise Distributed Systems Technology Ph: (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
