Subject:
|
Re: putting liquid into pneumatic elements (was Re: Darn those definitions (was: The new Super Car)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:36:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
802 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Ralph Hempel writes:
> > I've always found the 8250 Sub to be a bit "offensive" in this way: Does
> > it not ask to be put into water, having the shape of a sub marine?
> >
> > Fredrik
>
> But then why did they put wheels on the bottom?
Controlled "grounding" for movement over seabottom,surely?
Lots of things to research there, and the Captain wouldn't have to woory about
staying afloat all the time...
;-)
Martin "rollin' down the river" E.
[In fact, this is what I assumed when I first saw the 8250 box, and was
wondering if it might be submerged in real water - after all, the use of
pneumatics instead of electricity seemed to point in that direction, too...]
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
