 | | Re: Darn those definitions (was: The new Super Car) —Shawn Menninga
|
| | | (...) Disregarding definitions for the moment and returning to the original question (can Lego rightly call those parts hydraulic), can we all agree on the following: 1) There is a large group of fluids whose volume changes *almost* linearly with (...) (25 years ago, 8-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Darn those definitions (was: The new Super Car) —Jacob Schultz
|
| | | | What will actually happen, if you fill water into the LEGO pneumatic parts? Will they still work? And will they become hydrolics? Jacob -- Did you check the web site first?: (URL) (25 years ago, 8-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | putting liquid into pneumatic elements (was Re: Darn those definitions (was: The new Super Car) —Robert Munafo
|
| | | | (...) The pneumatic compression cylinders, also called "pumps" are not airtight, and they wouldn't be watertight if filled with water. When you push on them they would apply pressure to the water all right, but when you pull on them they would (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
