Subject:
|
Re: Lego and Linux
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Jul 1999 01:03:52 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.^stopspam^org
|
Viewed:
|
963 times
|
| |
|
|
Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> wrote:
> write in RcxCC, you'll be right at home with NQC. Of course all of the
> nice user interface features (syntax hilighting editor, direction control
> of the RCX, etc) are missing when you use plain old NQC.
On the other hand, you gain all the nice features of vim or jed or, um,
emacs. :)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lego and Linux
|
| I will never knock emacs again... a professor of mine is an emacs guru, and he literally runs his entire life in emacs. He browses, he calendarizes, he runs other programs (forget bash- emacs is the one true shell), and oh yeah, he codes. Wow. If (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lego and Linux
|
| (...) Just to clarify further, the RCX Command Center uses NQC as its compiler for generating RCX code. If you liked the sort of programs you could write in RcxCC, you'll be right at home with NQC. Of course all of the nice user interface features (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
