To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 5651
5650  |  5652
Subject: 
Re: new pics on legomindstorms.com
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 14 Jul 1999 03:27:17 GMT
Original-From: 
Luis Villa <liv@duke%SayNoToSpam%.edu>
Viewed: 
1847 times
  
I already oopsed on the age thing... but as for the rest, I agree that it
is certainly possible to learn the stuff- I started with basic at 8. But
the difference was that I had a reasonably clueful teacher to teach me- I
don't think that my step-mother will be teaching any coding classes soon,
and I wonder how many other parents will. In that sense, making parents
make sense of it is just as important, if not more so. I would love to
see Lego do this right- I want the company to be around in 10-15 years
for my kids. I just hope it works out for them, and they can find a
balance which doesn't scare off kids, but which allows for powerful
hardware for those of us who can use it in other ways. At the moment, I
get the feeling that the balance is too far towards ease of use. We'll
see with 1.5, I guess.
-Luis


On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, Marty wrote:
> 
> Luis Villa wrote:
> 
> > 
> > > Besides, many kids these days already have the knowledge on how programming
> > > flow works (if->then->else, while->do, etc),
> > 
> > Not real sure about that- my half-sister is often called by other adults
> > "scarily bright," and has received about as good an education as $$$ can
> > buy in the states. I'm sure she has the concepts, but not the language-
> > and that is what you need. Whether it is a graphical language or a text
> > based one (like we are used to) I'm not sure even she'd have the patience
> > to learn it, and she has more patience than any 8 year old I've ever met.
> 
> 
> I learnt to program when I was 10, since I did classes on how to program in Logo and a very small amount of Pascal.  I also taught myself basic
> around the same time.  Most of my programming ability (which isn't that much), remains from those distant days (though I am only 23).
>  Thus I think that kids are probably quite capable in programming much more complex programs than are possible with the language that comes with the
> mindstorms kit, especially if it is graphical in nature.  Also, the kit we get here (in Australia), has the recommended age as 13 years and up (if I
> remember correctly).
> 
> Thats just my opinion,
> Marty.


#######################################################################

     Profanity is the one language that all programmers understand.
                  -Anonymous

#######################################################################
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics



1 Message in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR