 | | Re: Some comments (long) —John A. Tamplin
|
| | | (...) Java is not particularly space efficient (in typical implementations) for several reasons: 1) value stacks are stored as a union of all the types you can store in a variable, so you eat up at least 32 bits (64 on an implementation supporting (...) (25 years ago, 8-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Some comments (long) —stephen p spackman
|
| | | | (...) Sure: one aspect of the "expanded" issue. (...) Well, dynamic loading, not late binding; this stuff would not be on the RCX - presumably almost all of the class loader remains on the host machine, with downloaded code pre-linked and (...) (25 years ago, 8-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Some comments (long) —John A. Tamplin
|
| | | | Let's move this discussion to lego-robotics-rcx, since that group was created for discussions like these. (...) Late binding requires the symbol table or some representation of the same thing. For example, you have C inheriting from B inheriting (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | .rcx alternative firmware group/list —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) John and several other people are set up with the new group and successfully posting to it, so this info is for anyone else: lugnet.robotics.rcx is a newsgroup running on the lugnet.com newsserver and it is available via e-mail as (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
