Subject:
|
Re: Machina Speculatrix Reproduction
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Mar 1999 00:34:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
923 times
|
| |
|
|
Doug Durham wrote in message
<005701be6534$35827740$6cd6bacd@doug-and-pam>...
> Hat's off to you!
Thanks. I have improved the images that were on the page originally. It
should be easier to see things now.
> I would go so far as to say, an analog robot is about the only way of • creating truly interesting
> behaviors.
I agree. You can create some very nonlinear functions with analog that
would be hard to duplicate in digital.
> > For more details please go to:
> > http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Michael_Gasperi/walter.htm
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Machina Speculatrix Reproduction
|
| (...) Since an analog circuit can be simulated by a digital computer, I am not sure I see that an analog computer is superior for robot behavior. It may very well be that a *simple* analog circuit is superior to an equally simple digital circuit, (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Machina Speculatrix Reproduction
|
| Hat's off to you! W. Grey Walter was one of my inspirations growing up. He's one of the reasons I majored in robotics in college. I hadn't even considered trying to reproduce his machines with Legos, what a great idea. However as you mention on your (...) (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
