 | | Re: Machina Speculatrix Reproduction —Pam Durham
|
| | | Hat's off to you! W. Grey Walter was one of my inspirations growing up. He's one of the reasons I majored in robotics in college. I hadn't even considered trying to reproduce his machines with Legos, what a great idea. However as you mention on your (...) (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Machina Speculatrix Reproduction —Michael Gasperi
|
| | | | Doug Durham wrote in message <005701be6534$358277...nd-pam>... (...) Thanks. I have improved the images that were on the page originally. It should be easier to see things now. (...) creating truly interesting (...) I agree. You can create some very (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Machina Speculatrix Reproduction —John A. Tamplin
|
| | | | (...) Since an analog circuit can be simulated by a digital computer, I am not sure I see that an analog computer is superior for robot behavior. It may very well be that a *simple* analog circuit is superior to an equally simple digital circuit, (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
