Subject:
|
Re: Contest
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Feb 1999 19:06:46 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Tom Rowton <trowton@broadcast&stopspammers&.com>
|
Viewed:
|
955 times
|
| |
|
|
Remember the bit about the new Lego Star wars robot thing -
Where you have a setting so that forward drives the motor and backward
closes the claw? That's one motor.
Set up another like in artoflego.pdf with that flat gear (and the worm gear
I think) for a steering mechanism - that's two motors.
Oversimplified, yes. But definitely doable I think.
trowt
-----Original Message-----
From: David Ungaro <ungarod@nortelnetworks.com>
To: Dan McCabe <danm@seanet.com>
Cc: lego-robotics@crynwr.com <lego-robotics@crynwr.com>
Date: Tuesday, February 23, 1999 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: Contest
> Good point - there were only 2 motors. It would be better if it were • multiple cans
> as well. The scoring system on that Dallas contest web page
> (http://www.dprg.org/CanCan.htm) looked pretty good to me.
>
> It is an interesting problem to drive the bot and pick up the can with only • 2
> motors... Tough...
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
> Dan McCabe wrote:
>
> > An interesting proposal.
> >
> > Joel Shafer wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > By the way, I'm open to extra kits or sensors being used, I just • suggested
> > > extra points being given for an RIS only solution.
> >
> >
> > I would presume that adding a third motor (like for a gripper to pick up • a Coke
> > can) would constitute a non-RIS only solution, since the RIS only comes • with two
> > motors? Although I guess you could capture the can with an indented ot • hollow
> > robot and push it out of the room.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > danm
> > --
> > Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
>
> --
> Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
