Subject:
|
Re: NQC v. LegOS
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 6 Feb 1999 13:55:56 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
"Keith Miller" <kmiller@talon.net>
|
Viewed:
|
980 times
|
| |
|
|
Well.. 1 legOS requires alot more disk space.. about 118 megs on my system..
-----Original Message-----
From: Luis Villa <liv@duke.edu>
To: lego-robotics@crynwr.com <lego-robotics@crynwr.com>
Date: Sunday, February 07, 1999 12:47 AM
Subject: NQC v. LegOS
> I've spent a good portion of the morning looking at homepages for both of • these
> systems, and I was wondering what the key differences are between the two?
> i.e., are there limitations in one that aren't present in the other? • Strengths?
> In particular, the NQC docs mention limitations on arithmetic, among other
> things. Does LegOS have the same issues? Are there other • strengths/weaknesses
> to the two that I should know about before I get into the nitty gritty of • it
> all?
>
> Thanks in advance-
> Luis Villa
> --
> Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: NQC v. LegOS
|
| (...) ??? I get roughly 3.6 megs for the complete precompiled binaries on my Redhat Linux 5.2 box. Am i missing something (besides the source, which I assume is not ~115 megs...)? -Luis ###...### "One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft (...) (26 years ago, 6-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
