 | | Re: NXT-G print to text?
|
|
(...) Nice defense! I'm sure the NI engineers have anticipated the complexities you've mentioned. Hence, no scary print-to-text. However, I'm not asking for anything so ambitious. I hold that a print-to-text within the context of plain NXT-G (no (...) (17 years ago, 21-Jul-08, to lugnet.events.brickworld, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Worm gear... whence the length?
|
|
"Brian Davis" <brdavis@iusb.edu> wrote in message news:K49Az5.87G@lugnet.com... (...) The problems with the worm gear that you describe are due to the fact that it has to fit into this part in this set and others, which was designed to accomodate (...) (17 years ago, 20-Jul-08, to lugnet.events.brickworld, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Worm gear... whence the length?
|
|
(...) True, with the caveat that the LEGO worm gear has only a single thread. Another way of putting it is that if you want to multiply align (stack) worm gears, the number of times the thread goes around the worm gear has to be an integer (or since (...) (17 years ago, 20-Jul-08, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Worm gear... whence the length?
|
|
(...) The number of thread has to be an integer. If not, you could not been able to use multiple worm gear on a same axle. And the thread pitch is determined from the straight gears pitch. (which is something like nPi/m studs (n,m being intergers). (...) (17 years ago, 19-Jul-08, to lugnet.events.brickworld, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT-G print to text?
|
|
(...) <grin>. I said "conclusions may now be drawn", not "all conclusions are equally likely to be correct". You seem to be assuming that NI is stupid or overconfident. I'm pretty sure that's not the case. When there's something I don't understand (...) (17 years ago, 19-Jul-08, to lugnet.robotics)
|
