 | | Re: FW: simple but functional radar
|
| In article <01BE3E64.27C95430.r....wave.ca>, Rob Giannini <rgiannin@shaw.wave.ca> writes (...) Yes (25 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: FW: simple but functional radar
|
| Ok concept..don't know if the RCX can handle this but could the RCX issue a coded ping, and wait for it to bounce, using the time delay to calculate the distance to the nearest object? or is th RCX clock to slow for this?? (...) Joe Greene Technical (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: FW: simple but functional radar
|
| In article <369D0A38.8BEA4429@o...disc.com>, Joe Greene <lugnet.robotics@lugnet.com> writes (...) By several orders of magnitude. The shortest possible ping is about 41 milliseconds long, and a reflection from a surface 2 feet away would only take 4 (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
