Subject:
|
Re: Control Lab & NQC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 May 2007 19:25:08 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
linmix <linmix@gmail.comNOSPAM>
|
Viewed:
|
4421 times
|
| |
|
|
Jordan Bradford wrote:
> The Control Lab is a serial I/O device. I don't see the benefit of using NQC
> with it since it doesn't run programs itself; the computer does. NQC would have
> to change in a fundamental way to accommodate it: either compile to bytecodes
> for a new "firmware" that runs on the PC and talks to the control lab, or
> compile directly to x86 assembly language.
>
> There used to be an ActiveX control at http://troyda.sas.muohio.edu/paper2.html
> to run the Control Lab using C or C++. Why not use real C?
Unfortunately the link is dead. Why not use real C? Because I'm not a
programmer and don't know C. Anything I do know (like NQC) I got from
tutorials specific for LEGO.
linmix
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Control Lab & NQC
|
| (...) linmix, if you can program in NQC, you can use C. It's pretty much the same language. You'll just have to learn how to use the serial port, it's not that hard. Get a book on C programming from your local library or bookstore. Get a little (...) (18 years ago, 7-May-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Control Lab & NQC
|
| (...) The Control Lab is a serial I/O device. I don't see the benefit of using NQC with it since it doesn't run programs itself; the computer does. NQC would have to change in a fundamental way to accommodate it: either compile to bytecodes for a (...) (18 years ago, 7-May-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
