 | | FW: simple but functional radar —Rob Giannini
|
| | | Right now my Robot is being controlled by the PC, does anyone know will the Radar Bot idea intercept signals from the Tower and think that it is near an object ? I would try my self, but I don't want to rebuild by current robot at the moment. (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: FW: simple but functional radar —Chris Stanley
|
| | | | | i've not tried this, but i would say that it almost certainly would. i can take my tv remote and zap the 'bot and it will turn away from it. -- Chris Stanley cstanley@usit.net (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: FW: simple but functional radar —Peter Hesketh
|
| | | | In article <01BE3E64.27C95430.r....wave.ca>, Rob Giannini <rgiannin@shaw.wave.ca> writes (...) Yes (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: FW: simple but functional radar —Joe Greene
|
| | | | Ok concept..don't know if the RCX can handle this but could the RCX issue a coded ping, and wait for it to bounce, using the time delay to calculate the distance to the nearest object? or is th RCX clock to slow for this?? (...) Joe Greene Technical (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: FW: simple but functional radar —Peter Hesketh
|
| | | | In article <369D0A38.8BEA4429@o...disc.com>, Joe Greene <lugnet.robotics@lugnet.com> writes (...) By several orders of magnitude. The shortest possible ping is about 41 milliseconds long, and a reflection from a surface 2 feet away would only take 4 (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
