 | | Re: NXT compatible bluetooth adapters
|
|
(...) Now that you mention it - does anyone have experience with the built-in Bluetooth solution(s) that come with recent-day Macs? I've got an iBook G4 w/ Bluetooth and will get a new MacBook pro later this year, it would just be great to know (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT compatible bluetooth adapters
|
|
Steve Hassenplug writes: > Here's a bit of a jumpstart for the list. I've collected this list over the > last couple months from the MDP. They are all reported to work. Do list members want me to throw this information up on (URL) ? Or is there a (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Memory - Where did it go?
|
|
(...) Everything in NXT-G is a block that you drag and drop onto your program. All blocks in NXT-G are LabView Virtual Instruments (VIs). Some blocks expand into a loop construct. Others expand into a switch construct. They often represent (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Memory - Where did it go?
|
|
(...) With a newly loaded firmware: C:\WINAPPS\projects\...c>nexttool /COM=x -freemem 70324 C:\WINAPPS\projects\...c>nexttool /COM=x -listfiles NVConfig.sys=1 RPGReader.sys=14346 Demo.rxe=9436 Try-Touch.rtm=3788 Try-Light.rtm=4456 Try-Sound.rtm=6864 (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX vs NXT for FIRST?
|
|
(...) If it is a what to buy question I would say NXT. The RCX will be obsolete in a few years. If you already have an RCX kit use it! I have been a coach for three years and each each we have added an RCX kit. I will still use the RCX kits to do (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Memory - Where did it go?
|
|
Regarding the question of some constant overhead plus some increment per block, the sound block example given computes to 0.5 kb overhead plus 0.2 kb per block. Edwin Tripp tripp@oclc.org -----Original Message----- Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | New newsgroup lugnet.robotics.nxt
|
|
A new newsgroup/list lugnet.robotics.nxt has been created for the focused discussion of LEGO NXT issues. Feel free to crosspost between .robotics / .robotics.rcx and .robotics.nxt, as appropriate, or just to .robotics if you feel your topic is of a (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.general, lugnet.announce, lugnet.robotics.nxt) !
|
| |
| | Re: NXT newsgroup needed
|
|
I still think it would be a good idea to have a separate NXT group. -- David Schilling (19 years ago, 9-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Have you got your NXT yet?
|
|
(...) This is absolutely true. (*1) I went on vacation a week ago Wednesday, and was REALLY hoping mine would get here before I left. It didn't. But sure enough, as soon as I had left, and didn't care about whether it came this week or next, it (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Midwest Robolab conference in Wichita, KS - July 15 early registration ends
|
|
Wichita State University is hosting a Workshop on Robolab Programming and LEGO MINDSTORMS this August 6-8. The keynote speaker is Chris Rogers, the inventor of Robolab Programming, and we will have national experts on different aspects of LEGO (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Mea Culpa
|
|
Greetings all, Dave here. I'm making a quick post to remove some of the confusion I may have inflicted on the community. I am assisting this year with gbc, not coordinating. Steve, Bryan, Brian, John, et. al. will still lead the pack like last year. (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: RCX vs NXT for FIRST?
|
|
As a coach of 5 years experience it depends on what your focus is...if it is educational - stick with RCX as the NXT takes away a lot of problem solving and thus learning on gear ratio's and motor strength. If it is simply to win - use the NXT. Our (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Memory - Where did it go?
|
|
(...) By "block" I mean a NXT-G code block as dropped from a pallet. Yep, you would think that these things would compile down to a single bytecode (or a few bytecode sequences), but they don't. There is an awful lot going on under the hood, and (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: NXT compatible bluetooth adapters
|
|
Thanks. I'll fix the list later today to show tested / untested, and review the entries that have been added... didn't get to do that yesterday. (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Memory - Where did it go?
|
|
(...) By "Block" you mean a simple operation like and add or a multiply or turning on a motor or reading a sensor? These 'blocks' ought to be turned into little interpreted byte-code segments - it's hard to imagine how a block could possibly take up (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Memory - Where did it go?
|
|
(...) Once you delete a lot of the "Try me" and on-brick programming stuff, this jumps up to (IMS) 120k+ or so. Still not ideal (yeah, I'd like a Mb of memory as well :-), but much better. As to what to delete, I've taken everything off but the (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: NXT compatible bluetooth adapters
|
|
Thank's for setting up that list. Is there a way to tell if an adapter has been tried and doesn't work, or just hasn't been tried? Note that I did get he Kensington to work on XP and OS X as you can see from my later post. (19 years ago, 7-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Memory - Where did it go?
|
|
I got my Mindstorms NXT this past weekend and built the demo unit and then the Claw with only minor programming errors. Tonight I started using some of the various programming functions. My first program was to use the sonar and detect the presence (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability
|
|
(...) I recall reading about Steve's ideas of sectors to handle downed modules. Is this a given or some optional aspect? I would think it would be mandatory. I think at this point, I'm going with the KISS plan, but I'm trying to learn as much as (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability
|
|
(...) <sigh> This is why one of designs I mentioned had a second, variable output. One in::two out. If the input rate was say 3 bps, then the two outputs would be equal to 3 (in this case) 1bps and 2bps. I didn't give a very detailed explanation of (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
