 | | Re: Ultrasonic sensor interactions
|
|
The problem here is the management of a single shared resource, i.e. the air through which the ultrasonic signals travel. The lack of a Bluetooth broadcast mechanism makes the implementation of a conventional resource locking system difficult, but (...) (19 years ago, 21-May-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultrasonic sensor interactions
|
|
(...) This is a great idea except for one very important item: there is no such thing as a broadcast message (ie: a message sent to everyone) using Bluetooth. So for any such system to work, each robot has to know about every other robot, and send (...) (19 years ago, 21-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultrasonic sensor interactions
|
|
(...) The problem with that is that both NXT machines may be listening. Neither hears anything - so both decide to emit a ping - and they still interfere with each other. The nasty part is that even if you can detect that an interference happened, (...) (19 years ago, 20-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultrasonic sensor interactions
|
|
(...) A better alternative would be to develop protocols in which the NXT controllers use their communications to tell each other what they are about to do. If you can sent a message that says "I'm about to do an ultrasound 'ping' - so you'd better (...) (19 years ago, 20-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultrasonic sensor interactions
|
|
(...) Very feasible... IF you could turn the US sensor off. As near as I can determine, the US sensor, when connected, is never off: it is always emitting a series of "pings" (you can actually hear a "click" from the sensor if you are really close). (...) (19 years ago, 20-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
