 | | Re: NXT to NXT communication? —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | (...) Dave, I don't know a whole lot about BT (beyond the little I've found out because of this project), but your assessment is correct. The protocol is implemented according to BT spec, so all communication is done through master-slave (...) (18 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: NXT to NXT communication? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) A little - the next question of course is: Can NXT1 be both slave (to NXT0) and master (to NXT2, NXT3, NXT4) at the same time? Or does that require sneaky protocol to switch between the 2? ROSCO (18 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: NXT to NXT communication? —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes. NXT1 will be connected via connection 0 from NXT0 NXT1 will be connected via connection 1 to NXT2 NXT1 will be connected via connection 2 to NXT3 NXT1 will be connected via connection 3 to NXT4 NXT1 can send a message to connection 0,1,2, (...) (18 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: NXT to NXT communication? —David Hurley
|
| | | | (...) Yes just kinda murky now! There are still good opportunities for a wireless network of NXT's! One could write a program on a single master and control as many lower level NXT's as you could bring together! Like one general commanding three (...) (18 years ago, 5-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
