 | | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
|
(...) Quite muddy! Why only three connections and what about specification adherence? Are they trying to limit its potential applications or were they just trying to get out a production-ready implementation? In other words are there plans for an (...) (18 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
|
(...) John Barnes and others have been working on that. He has out a beta of a "Nxt Byte Code" (NBC) assembler, and he's dug into a *lot* of firmware and software details. See the following (& John's website) for more details. (URL) not as sure (...) (18 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
|
(...) I a slight mis-statement. John Hansen is the NBC guy. Kevin (18 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
|
(...) Thank you, Kevin - yes, I should have said John Hansen. My fault entirely, sorry about that John. (18 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
|
(...) As Brian already mentioned I have produced a compiler for a text-based language (assembly) which is called Next Byte Codes (NBC) for a number of complicated reasons. Michael Barrett Anderson, who is the father of LASM and the RCX firmware, has (...) (18 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
