 | | Re: NXT and bluetooth enabled phones
|
|
(...) Ugh.. she mentions communicating to the NXT with J2ME on your phone. Seriously depressing that I might have to learn Java. That is one bandwagon that I have long avoided. ---...--- Matthew C. Ruschmann (URL) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT and bluetooth enabled phones
|
|
(...) Me too and I work for Sun! My life plan to never program in COBOL is working out (now that we're clear of Y2K), but Java might be harder to avoid. (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT and bluetooth enabled phones
|
|
(...) Just because you'll be using a JVM doesn't necessarily mean you have to program in Java. There's a chance some other compiler capable of targeting the JVM might provide a neater language: (URL) not sure how many of those might be compatible (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT and bluetooth enabled phones
|
|
(...) only bluetooth device is a phone. But if you're using a Bluetooth enabled PC there are many options. (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT and bluetooth enabled phones
|
|
(...) I'm curious... What is it about java that you want to avoid? Is it just that you perceive it as a band wagon that everyone and their brother is jumping on to look cool? I can see that about it. And things like that have made me avoid things in (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT and bluetooth enabled phones
|
|
(...) My current project involves dealing with mobile devices and understanding their development frameworks. I have found J2ME to be an excellent platform to develop apps but is still not quite complete. The issue is mobile devices have gotten more (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
