Subject:
|
Re: mindstorms NXT and memory
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 03:38:49 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Ignacio Martinez Vazquez <IGNAMV@GMAIL.COMnospam>
|
Viewed:
|
9045 times
|
| |
|
|
> The point is that having such an incredibly small amount of memory
> (by modern standards) forces you into ugly compromise solutions from
> your shiney new system from day #1.
Yup. For my solution, you need ugly byte operation. Not good for a 10
year old. Still, with these robots you often design the environment to
suit your limitations (eg. smaller room)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: mindstorms NXT and memory
|
| (...) You could - but I might want to store more than one bit of information per square inch (eg a 'confidence' figure or a 'time since last mapped' number - or to store multiple maps so I can see how the map is changing over time). The point is (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
223 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
