Subject:
|
Re: mindstorms NXT
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 6 Jan 2006 01:57:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7366 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Simon Bogaert wrote:
>
> Also, with these new connectors, you cannot easily piggyback a second motor
> off of the same output port, making it impossible to use two motors for the
> same purpose; propulsion, for instance... So I guess we all would like to
> see some way to connect more than one motor to an output port, even if this
> means you don't have monitoring.
If you look at the picture of the new motor, you may notice that the orange disk
with the cross axle hole in the center appears to be a single piece with four
pin holes in addition. This might give the impression that the available torque
may be high enough to endanger the integrity of a single cross axle if it were
the only torque transfer structure.
JB
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: mindstorms NXT
|
| (...) Sure, but that's only a benefit if you're attaching it direct to shatever needs the high torque. If you need some kind of transmission (which will probably be often with such big motors) the advantage is lost. ROSCO (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: mindstorms NXT
|
| Well, 3 motors/output ports never were enough... (at least, when the bot wasn't big enough for multiple RCX's, or if you don't own more than one) I guess that's something that won't change easily... :) Off course, there's all sorts of workarounds to (...) (19 years ago, 5-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
223 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
