Subject:
|
Re: NQC Programmers do it on one line
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:46:12 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Ignacio Martinez Vazquez <ignamv@gmail.com+IHateSpam+>
|
Viewed:
|
1220 times
|
| |
|
|
> I always thought the best way to do this would be to write a program to do it
> for you. This way the computer could redefine every function and operator and
> make the program absolutely unreadable.
>
> You could even enter your obfuscation program into the competition, once you
> had
> used the program on itself to obfuscate it.
>
> Steve
They run it through several "beautifying" programs, which eliminate
all #define obfuscations.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: NQC Programmers do it on one line
|
| (...) Yeah - simple bad naming of variables and weird indentation is nowhere *near* the degree of weirdness these guys get up to. I don't think you could automate the kinds of creative obfuscation you need to get your code into the winner's circle (...) (19 years ago, 25-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: NQC Programmers do it on one line
|
| (...) I always thought the best way to do this would be to write a program to do it for you. This way the computer could redefine every function and operator and make the program absolutely unreadable. You could even enter your obfuscation program (...) (19 years ago, 24-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
