 | | Re: NQC Programmers do it on one line —Steve Lane
|
| | | (...) I always thought the best way to do this would be to write a program to do it for you. This way the computer could redefine every function and operator and make the program absolutely unreadable. You could even enter your obfuscation program (...) (19 years ago, 24-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: NQC Programmers do it on one line —Ignacio Martinez Vazquez
|
| | | | (...) They run it through several "beautifying" programs, which eliminate all #define obfuscations. (19 years ago, 25-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: NQC Programmers do it on one line —steve
|
| | | | (...) Yeah - simple bad naming of variables and weird indentation is nowhere *near* the degree of weirdness these guys get up to. I don't think you could automate the kinds of creative obfuscation you need to get your code into the winner's circle (...) (19 years ago, 25-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | mindrover RCX pack —dan miller
|
| | | | anyone familiar with this program? (URL) an add-on to Cognitoy's Mindrover simulation game, which apparently allows you to simulate some Lego 'bots, then run the code for real. If anyone has used this tool or has any relevant feedback, please reply. (...) (19 years ago, 25-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
