Subject:
|
Re: Robotic simulators
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:06:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
953 times
|
| |
|
|
dan miller wrote:
> > Whilst I'm sure you could build some sort of simulator - I'd be pretty
> > sceptical about it's ability to predict the performance of a real Lego
> > robot with any kind of fidelity.
>
> I'm surprised to hear that. While obviously it wouldn't be perfect, it
> seems to me that the granular, quantized nature of Lego parts would make
> calculating the behavior of various linkages, gearing, etc. pretty
> straightforward.
Sure. But that does not automatically lead to good results. I think you
can be able to mimic the internals of a robot with some precision. Ah,
you will limit your robot to some drive-and-seek robot, I think? I mean,
you don't want to simulate a chess playing robot?
Even if you can handle the robot's internals, you will get problems if
you try to get the same results "in real life". Your carpet gives other
friction, your wooden floor has some cracks your robot will follow a bit
and so on. I played with simulators for a while and they can help to
understand how to program the robot. But on the other hand, that is what
I build my Lego robot for...
> Anyway, seems like a cool idea.
Right! Any success stories are welcome :)
Regards,
Michael
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Robotic simulators
|
| --- Steve Baker <sjbaker1@airmail.net> wrote: [3D Lego simulator] (...) I'd be interested to hear about your experiences. The codebase I'm looking at is called Gazebo ((URL) it sits on top of ODE, and seems to do a pretty good job of simulating (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
