Subject:
|
Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 12 Mar 2005 14:55:23 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Steve Baker <SJBAKER1@saynotospamAIRMAIL.NET>
|
Viewed:
|
982 times
|
| |
|
|
dan miller wrote:
> not to belabor this issue, but...
It *is* belaboring the issue. All of the points you raise have already
been discussed at length.
This thread needs to die. Nobody is changing anyones minds anymore.
---------------------------- Steve Baker -------------------------
HomeEmail: <sjbaker1@airmail.net> WorkEmail: <sjbaker@link.com>
HomePage : http://www.sjbaker.org
Projects : http://plib.sf.net http://tuxaqfh.sf.net
http://tuxkart.sf.net http://prettypoly.sf.net
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GCS d-- s:+ a+ C++++$ UL+++$ P--- L++++$ E--- W+++ N o+ K? w--- !O M-
V-- PS++ PE- Y-- PGP-- t+ 5 X R+++ tv b++ DI++ D G+ e++ h--(-) r+++ y++++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
| not to belabor this issue, but... At first glance, Mindscript seems rather NQC-ish. How hard would it be to write a compiler for NQC-->MindScript? Alternatively, couldn't one rather easily take the output bytecodes, and write a program to parse them (...) (20 years ago, 12-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
