Subject:
|
Re: RIS 2.0 Problems
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 01:06:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2741 times
|
| |
|
|
John Hansen wrote:
> The flaw in this sort of logic is the assumption that more productive
> programming leads to a more likely to win FLL robot. This is definitely not
> true. The far more likely scenario is this: experienced robot designer leads to
> more likely to win FLL robot.
Right, but you're liable to see a lot of crossover between the two
groups (programmers and robot designers). A person who is interested in
one has a similar enough mindset to those interested in the other
subject that you can expect that a lot of people who are experienced in
either category will be proficient in both.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: RIS 2.0 Problems
|
| (...) The flaw in this sort of logic is the assumption that more productive programming leads to a more likely to win FLL robot. This is definitely not true. The far more likely scenario is this: experienced robot designer leads to more likely to (...) (20 years ago, 9-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
114 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
