Subject:
|
Re: Internals
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:07:33 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Juergen Stuber <juergen@jstuber&AntiSpam&.net>
|
Viewed:
|
1108 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi Geoffrey,
"Geoffrey Hyde" <g.hyde@bigpond.net.au> writes:
>
> If you look at picture one then picture two, you will notice in the second
> picture that all but the very last of the four gears actually has a second
> gear cast onto it, making the three of them essentially two gears and not
> one. What this essentially does is introduce a simple reduction drive
> mechanism, also known in a lot of applications as a speed reduction gearbox,
> into each gear, as it turns the next gear in line a bit slower.
I know that, but the gears that I mean don't take part in the reduction,
the reduction is essentially done only by the axis next to the motor.
> I don't think you can turn these around, it would do little, and possibly
> burn out the drive motor from excessive friction generation. Reduction
> mechanisms are generally not intended to overdrive the gears they mesh with.
I was only wondering why they would put two gears on an axis when
the second one was not used, but maybe they just reused existing parts.
Jürgen
--
NO to the planned nodding through of the EU software patent directive!
Jürgen Stuber <juergen@jstuber.net>
http://www.jstuber.net/
gnupg key fingerprint = 2767 CA3C 5680 58BA 9A91 23D9 BED6 9A7A AF9E 68B4
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Internals
|
| If you look at picture one then picture two, you will notice in the second picture that all but the very last of the four gears actually has a second gear cast onto it, making the three of them essentially two gears and not one. What this (...) (19 years ago, 7-Feb-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
